Matt Ingalls

2006-01-22 19:34:07 UTC

is the power-of-2 function table size requirement gone for csound5?

if so, can you PLEASE remove it? the optimization it gives is far

less important than

the convenience of specifying your own size.

ideally, it would be better to have "deferred" size for most GEN

routines --

just give a '0' as the size for most GENS and let the routine

calculate the size.

multichannel tables expanded beyond loscil family would be nice as

well..

Thanks,

Matt;

________________________

matt ingalls

http://sonomatics.com

-------------------------------------------------------

This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files

for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes

searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!

http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642

if so, can you PLEASE remove it? the optimization it gives is far

less important than

the convenience of specifying your own size.

ideally, it would be better to have "deferred" size for most GEN

routines --

just give a '0' as the size for most GENS and let the routine

calculate the size.

multichannel tables expanded beyond loscil family would be nice as

well..

Thanks,

Matt;

________________________

matt ingalls

http://sonomatics.com

-------------------------------------------------------

This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files

for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes

searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!

http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642